Type: Publications

Medical-Writing-Special-Edition-2-Front-Cover
Truth be Told: Where AI and Automation Can Really Take Us
AI and automation are both exciting and daunting prospects in the future of medical writing, but the advantages of these tools should be scrutinised, as well as what they mean...
Author: Julia Forjanic Klapproth and Angela Russell Winnier
Journal: Medical Writing Special Edition No. 2
Date: February 2020
Medical-Writing-Special-Edition-2-Front-Cover
The Clinical Evaluation Report: Bringing it Together
In light of recent regulations, it is important to discuss the general aspects and strategies for writing and compiling a CER. In Europe, a clinical evaluation report (CER) is now...
Author: Gerard McGregor
Journal: Medical Writing Special Edition No. 2
Date: February 2020
Medical-Writing-Special-Edition-2-Front-Cover
Taming the Complexity of Preparing CTD Submission Dossiers
Process optimisation and effective management and organisation strategies are essential components when preparing CTD submission dossiers for drug approval. “Be prepared.” In his book, Scouting for Boys, Robert Baden-Powell introduced...
Author: Douglas Fiebig, Johan Telen
Journal: Medical Writing Special Edition No. 2
Date: February 2020
Medical-Writing-Special-Edition-2-Front-Cover
Implications of Policy 0070 for the Writing of Clinical Dossiers
EMA Policy 0070 requires the publishing of all clinical reports submitted as part of MAAs, so it is important to highlight what new challenges this may bring for the writing...
Author: Julia Forjanic Klapproth, Jo Anne-Marie Blyskal
Journal: Medical Writing Special Edition No. 2
Date: February 2020
Medical-Writing-Special-Edition-2-Front-Cover
Achieving a Work-Life Balance as Medical Writers
In any industry, there is considerable evidence of the value and improved productivity for those who maintain a healthy work-life balance, and we should not forget that a near total...
Author: Barry Drees
Journal: Medical Writing – A Bold New Path: The Future Awaits Us
Date: February 2020
Medical-Writing-Special-Edition-2-Front-Cover
Medical Writing - A Bold New Path: The Future Awaits Us
The second edition of Trilogy’s special edition magazine, Medical Writing – A Bold New Path: The Future Awaits Us, was published at the beginning of 2020. Once again, Trilogy Writing...
Journal: Special Edition of International Clinical Trials, ICT
Date: February 2020
CTI2019.2
Lay Summaries and Writing for Patients
The most recent changes to regulatory legislation in terms of information for patients – the introduction of the lay summary of the risk management plan (RMP) and the lay summary of clinical trial results (CTRs) – have caused great discussion and concern in an industry very willing to provide information to patients, but more used to producing complex scientific information for regulatory authorities (RAs).
Author: Lisa Chamberlain James and Trishna Bharadia
Journal: Clinical Trials Insight
Date: Winter 2019
Cover-Pharma-Tech-Outlook
Quality-Driven Medical Writing
For years, the clinical drug development industry has been waging war against the surging drug development costs and tediously long processes. More efficient decision making during drug development would be...
Author: Stacey Smith
Journal: Pharma Tech Outlook, Clinical Trial Management Edition
Date: December 2019
OCT-Handbook-Cover-2020
The Lay Summary – Remember the Reader
In 2014, as part of its Clinical Trial Transparency initiative, the EMA mandated a requirement (CTR EU No 536/2014) for clinical trial sponsors to prepare a summary of the results of every clinical trial written in language understandable to lay persons (plain language) no later than one year after the end of the trial in the EU. These CTR lay summaries will be made available in a new EU database; it was planned for 2018, but it is likely that it will not now be implemented before 2020.
Author: Lisa Chamberlain James and Barry Drees
Journal: Outsourcing in Clinical Trials Handbook 2020
Date: 2020
emwa-2019
Lay Summaries and Writing for Patients: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
We examine the trend for increasing and more transparent patient information and ask how close we have come in the last few years to producing useful and meaningful information for patients. We also outline the challenges faced by medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry as a whole in trying to comply with recent European requirements for the creation of lay summaries of key regulatory submission documents.
Author: Lisa Chamberlain James and Trishna Bharadia
Journal: Medical Writing, the journal of EMWA
Date: Vol. 28 No. 3, September 2019
Generics and Biosimilars
Biosimilar Development – An Overview
Biosimilars are biological drugs that are similar to, and cheaper than other biological drugs (called “reference originator biologics”) that are already in use. They share an identical amino-acid sequence but, given the inherent variability of biological molecules, not full “sameness”.
Author: Diana Radovan
Journal: Medical Writing, the journal of EMWA
Date: Summer 2019
MedDevDev
Strategic medical writing for device submissions
Julia Forjanic Klapproth of Trilogy Writing & Consulting GmbH elucidates how it’s time to start using strategic medical writing in the world of device submissions. Until recently, the documents needed...
Author: Julia Forjanic Klapproth
Journal: Medical Device Developments
Date: 2019, Volume 1
TOPRA
The challenges of producing periodic benefit–risk evaluation reports
This article discusses the challenges of producing a periodic benefit–risk evaluation report (PBRER) from a writing perspective. It explains that by taking into consideration the most common pitfalls encountered by...
Author: Lisa Chamberlain James and Stephanie Millican
Journal: Regulatory Rapporteur
Date: Vol. 16, Issue 5, May 2019
AMWA-journal-232x300
How to Build a Medical Writer: Medical Writing Apprenticeships - New Training for a New Breed
Everyone involved in preparing regulatory documentation in the pharmaceutical industry is always on a desperate look out for excellent medical writers with years of experience writing the documents they need....
Author: Julia Forjanic Klapproth and Lisa Chamberlain James
Journal: AMWA Journal
Date: Vol. 34, No. 2, Summer 2019
EMWA-Journal-27-4
Help Reviewers Tell You What They Want
Review is an integral part of the medical writing process and relies on clear communication between the medical writer and the reviewer(s). This is a two-way street. Review can be...
Author: Diana Radovan
Journal: Medical Writing, the journal of EMWA
Date: Vol. 27 No. 4, December 2018
EMWA-Journal
Getting the most out of quality control specialists: Practical guidance for medical writers
Quality control (QC) is a process that usually occurs when a document is in a near-final or final state. It involves the checking of documents by QC specialists against source...
Author: Claire Jones
Journal: Medical Writing, the journal of EMWA
Date: Vol. 27, No.3, September 2018
JCS-Vol-10-Issue-4
Writing Pediatric Study Plans (PSPs) - The Impact of the Revised 2016 FDA Draft Guidance
An initial Pediatric Study Plan (iPSP) is an outline of the paediatric study or studies that the drug development sponsor plans to conduct in the US to confirm the suitability...
Author: Diana Radovan and Rachel Beeby
Journal: Journal for Clinical Studies
Date: 2018 - Volume 10 - Issue 4
medical-device-developments-journal
Getting the Writing Right
Gerry McGregor, a principal medical writer at Trilogy Writing & Consulting, explains how experienced medical writers can help medical device manufacturers to meet the new regulatory demands of producing clinical...
Author: Gerard McGregor
Journal: Medical Device Developments
Date: 2018 - Volume 2
emwa mouse
The reproducibility crisis in preclinical research - lessons to learn from clinical research
In recent years, the robustness and reproducibility of preclinical data have been a topic for discussion. Quality standards and good practices are often not well defined for different in vitro...
Author: Laia Pedro-Roig
Journal: Medical Writing Volume 26, Number 4
Date: December 2017
Journal for Clinical Studies FC
The Lay Summary - Remember the Reader
As part of its Clinical Trial Transparency initiative, the EMA mandated a requirement for clinical trial sponsors to prepare a summary of the results of every clinical trial written in language understandable to lay persons (patients and others not in the pharmaceutical industry). The regulation (CTR EU No 536/2014) obliges the company to produce this summary of results for the lay audience one year after the end of the trial in the EU.
Author: Lisa Chamberlain James and Barry Drees
Journal: Journal for Clinical Studies
Date: Dec 2017, Vol. 9, No. 6